姝¤繋瑷晱(w猫n)鑰冪爺绉樼睄鑰冪爺缍�(w菐ng)!    鐮旂┒鐢熸嫑鐢熶俊鎭恫(w菐ng)    鑰冨崥鐪熼涓嬭級    鑰冪爺鐪熼涓嬭級    鍏ㄧ珯鏂囩珷绱㈠紩
鏂囩珷鎼滅储
   
  楂樼礆(j铆)鎼滅储   

 鎮ㄧ従(xi脿n)鍦ㄧ殑浣嶇疆锛� 鑰冪爺绉樼睄鑰冪爺缍�(w菐ng) >> 鏂囩珷涓績 >> 鑰冪爺鑻辫獮(y菙) >> 姝f枃  娴欐睙甯寖澶у(xu茅)2011骞磋嫳瑾�(y菙)瀵�(xi臎)浣滆€冪爺鐪熼瑭﹀嵎

鏂拌仦璩囪▕
鏅€氭枃绔� 涓婃捣甯�50瀹跺柈浣嶇恫(w菐ng)涓婃帴鍙楀挩瑭㈠拰鍫�(b脿o)鍚�
鏅€氭枃绔� 鍖椾含澶у(xu茅)鐢�“灏辨キ(y猫)涔嬪”鐮旂┒鐢熷皥鍫�(ch菐ng)鎷涜仒鍫�(ch菐ng)闈㈢伀鐖�
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤堝ぇ濂崇爺绌剁敓琚妗堢祩瀵╁垽姹� 鍏囨墜琚垽姝诲垜
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤f澅鍏牎缍�(w菐ng)涓婅│榛�(di菐n)鑰冪爺鍫�(b脿o)鍚嶅皣闁�(k膩i)濮�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞寸ⅸ澹寳浜嫑鐢熷柈浣嶅牨(b脿o)鍚嶉粸(di菐n)涓€瑕�
鏅€氭枃绔� 娲涢櫧(y谩ng)楂樻柊鍗€(q奴)21鍚嶇ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓琚仒鐐轰腑灞ら牁(l菒ng)灏�(d菐o)
鏅€氭枃绔� 娴欐睙鐪佺ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓鍫�(b脿o)鍚嶅緸涓嬪懆涓€闁�(k膩i)濮�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞翠笂?锛熺礀^(q奴)缍�(w菐ng)涓婂牨(b脿o)鍚嶆檪(sh铆)闁撳畨鎺掕〃
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤f澅锛氱爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│2003骞磋捣閲嶅ぇ瑾�(di脿o)鏁�
鏅€氭枃绔� 2004骞村叏鍦�(gu贸)鐮旀嫑涓�?锛熺礀^(q奴)鍫�(b脿o)鍚嶉粸(di菐n)涓€瑕借〃
瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 瀵у澶у(xu茅)04骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 澶ч€i惖閬撳(xu茅)闄�04骞寸ⅸ澹帴鏀惰(di脿o)鍔戠敓婧愬熀鏈師鍓�
鏅€氭枃绔� 鍚夋灄澶у(xu茅)寤鸿ō(sh猫)宸ョ▼瀛�(xu茅)闄�04骞寸爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 婧窞甯寖瀛�(xu茅)闄�(婧窞澶у(xu茅)绫�)05鐮旂┒鐢熻(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 浣虫湪鏂ぇ瀛�(xu茅)04骞磋€冪爺瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 娌堥櫧(y谩ng)寤虹瓚宸ョ▼瀛�(xu茅)闄�04骞寸爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 澶╂触甯寖澶у(xu茅)鏀挎不鑸囪鏀垮(xu茅)闄�05骞寸ⅸ澹(di脿o)鍔戦渶姹�
鏅€氭枃绔� 绗簩蹇楁効鑰冪爺瑾�(di脿o)鍔戠▼搴忕瓟鐤�
鏅€氭枃绔� 涓婃捣澶у(xu茅)04骞寸爺绌剁敓鎷涙敹绲�(t菕ng)鑰冪敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�
鏅€氭枃绔� 寤hタ澶у(xu茅)04骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓瑾�(di脿o)鍔戜俊鎭�

鍙嬫儏鎻愮ず锛氭湰绔欐彁渚涘叏鍦�(gu贸)400澶氭墍楂樼瓑闄㈡牎鎷涙敹纰╁+銆佸崥澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│姝峰勾鑰冪爺鐪熼銆佽€冨崥鐪熼銆佺瓟妗�锛岄儴鍒嗗(xu茅)鏍℃洿鏂拌嚦2012骞�锛�2013骞�锛涘潎鎻愪緵鏀惰不(f猫i)涓嬭級銆� 涓嬭級娴佺▼锛� 鑰冪爺鐪熼 榛�(di菐n)鎿娾€�鑰冪爺瑭﹀嵎鈥濃€濅笅杓�; 鑰冨崥鐪熼 榛�(di菐n)鎿娾€�鑰冨崥瑭﹀嵎搴�(k霉)鈥� 涓嬭級 

娴欐睙甯寖澶у(xu茅)2011骞寸ⅸ澹爺绌剁敓鍏ュ(xu茅)鑰冭│鍒濊│瑭﹂(A鍗�)

绉戠洰浠g⒓:

851

绉戠洰鍚嶇ū:

鑻辫獮(y菙)瀵�(xi臎)浣�

閬╃敤灏堟キ(y猫):

050201鑻辫獮(y菙)瑾�(y菙)瑷€鏂囧(xu茅)銆�050211澶栧湅(gu贸)瑾�(y菙)瑷€瀛�(xu茅)鍙婃噳(y墨ng)鐢ㄨ獮(y菙)瑷€瀛�(xu茅)銆�045108瀛�(xu茅)绉戞暀瀛�(xu茅)锛堣嫳瑾�(y菙)锛�

 

鎻愮ず锛�

1銆佽珛(q菒ng)灏囨墍鏈夌瓟妗堝(xi臎)浜庣瓟椤岀礄涓�锛屽(xi臎)鍦ㄨ│椤屼笂鐨勪笉绲﹀垎锛�

2銆佽珛(q菒ng)?zh铆)椤�?xi臎)婧�(zh菙n)鑰冭瓑铏�(h脿o)鍚�6浣嶏細____________銆�

 

I. Summary writing (40 marks).

Read the following passage and sum up the main idea in no more than 120 words. Exceeding the word limit will result in a loss of marks.

鈥�

In this study 89 texts in Chinese language readers are identified as constructing a discourse of cultural values and beliefs based on Lemke鈥檚 framework of intertexuality (Liu, Y. B., 2003). The discourse of cultural values and beliefs are constructed from five different perspectives, namely, concentration and diligence, honesty, respect for authority, modesty and tolerance, and collective spirit. These perspectives are, in fact, cultural norms constructed within the language readers to encourage child readers to learn and obey. In other words, these cultural values and beliefs are the kind of desired behaviours that the government and cultural elites are interested in transmitting to their younger citizens through language education.

 

Concentration and Diligence

The perspective of concentration and diligence receives the most attention; 25 texts fall into this subcategory. These texts are designed to cultivate in children either the value of hard work, or the importance of concentration on study. While constructing this value, the texts deliberately rule out other possibilities (for example interest, curiosity, and motivation) as the following analysis shows.

 

A Little Monkey

One day, a little monkey went down the hill. When he came to a cornfield he saw many big corns in the field. He was pleased. He broke off a corn. With the corn on his shoulder he went ahead.

When he came to a peach tree, he saw there were many big and red peaches on the tree. He was very glad. He threw away his corn and climbed up the tree to pick peaches. He got several peaches.

When he came to a watermelon field, he saw the field was littered with many big and round watermelons. He was very excited. He threw away the peaches and began to pick watermelon. He carried a very big watermelon.

On his way back, he saw a little rabbit hobbling around. He felt the rabbit would be lovely. He threw away his melon and began to chase the rabbit. The rabbit ran into a bush and disappeared. The little monkey had to go home with nothing in his hand. (Yuwen Bianjishi, 1999, Vol. 2, pp. 18-20)

 

In this story a little monkey is the initiator of a series of actions. The actions are highly regulated in the story grammar structure: initial event, internal response, attempt, and consequence in each of the four paragraphs. The repetition of this story grammar structure (four times, enabling the teaching of high frequency verbs such as 鈥樷€榗ome鈥欌€�, 鈥樷€榮ee鈥欌€�, 鈥樷€榯hrow away鈥欌€� and synonymous adjectives such as 鈥樷€榩leased鈥欌€�, 鈥樷€榞lad鈥欌€�, 鈥樷€榚xcited鈥欌€�) depicts the little monkey repeating the four actions in the same pattern, which involve choices of four different objects. The choices are made based on mere emotion (pleased, glad, excited) rather than purpose or reasoning. The resolution or the didactic effect is that the little monkey has achieved nothing (went home empty handed). The didactic or moral is implicit, but not difficult for the child reader to infer: 鈥樷€業f you want to achieve anything, you have to be purposeful or concentrate on one thing rather than do something out of emotion or out of mere interest鈥欌€�. By nature, children are always curious about their surroundings and would try to experience different things that arouse their interest. By recognizing this characteristic, the story intends to tame the 鈥樷€榮avage mind鈥欌€� that is easily distracted by seemingly unnecessary objects. In order to emphasize the value of concentration on study, the story implicitly condemns children鈥檚 self-interest and natural curiosity about what happens around them, thus suppressing the creativity that is regarded as one of the most important educational goals in the recent education debate in China (Liu, F., 1995).

A unique discourse option is exercised throughout this and many other stories in the textbooks. Through the story grammatical structure, initial event, internal response (optional sometimes), attempt, consequence, reaction (optional), and resolution, a series of on-going events is narrated. The resolution in the story grammar takes the form of a didactic utterance at the end of the story either by the narrator or a principle character, which in turn reframes the previous events. This feature functions as an interpretation within the text to restate and reinforce an intended message. Therefore child readers are positioned to believe that only through concentration on their tasks can they achieve a desirable result. Otherwise, they are doomed to failure.

 

Honesty

The perspective of honesty is achieved through 11 texts. The themes of the texts range from not telling lies to not accepting what does not belong to you. Honesty is important to any society. It is a universal value and belief that is cherished and promoted. The meaning of honesty is clear, rendering further explanation unnecessary, so let鈥檚 turn to the text and see how the discourse is constructed in the textbooks.

 

A Story of the Axe

A long, long time ago, there was a poor boy. One day, he went to the mountain to cut firewood. He dropped his axe into a river by accident when he crossed the river over a single wood bridge. He was so worried that he burst into tears. He sobbed: 鈥樷€楬ow can I cut fire wood without the axe!鈥欌€� Suddenly an old white-beared grandpa came out of the flowing water and asked with care: 鈥樷€榃hose child is crying so sadly?鈥欌€� The boy said: 鈥樷€楪randpa, I dropped my axe into the river. I cannot cut fire wood!鈥欌€� The grandpa said: 鈥樷€楧on鈥檛 cry, child! I鈥檒l help you to find it.鈥欌€� While talking, he went into the river and came out with a golden axe. He asked: 鈥樷€業s this your axe?鈥欌€�

The boy said: 鈥樷€楴o, it is not.鈥欌€� The grandpa went into the river again and came out with a silver axe. He asked: 鈥樷€業s this yours?鈥欌€� The boy shook his head, saying: 鈥樷€楴o, it is not mine.鈥欌€� The grandpa went into the river again and came up with an iron axe. He asked: 鈥樷€業s this your axe?鈥欌€� The boy said gladly: 鈥樷€榊es, it is mine. Thank you, Grandpa!鈥欌€� The grandpa smiled and said: 鈥樷€楥hild, since you are honest, I give the other two axes to you too.鈥欌€� The boy said: 鈥樷€楪randpa, they are not mine. I cannot accept them.鈥欌€� The boy took his own axe and went away. Looking at the boy鈥檚 disappearing figure, the grandpa nodded his head with a smile. (Yuwen Bianjishi, 1999, Vol. 2, pp. 118-121)

 

Again, the story grammar consists of a repetition of a macropropositional sequence: initial event, internal response, attempt, and consequence. However, the sequence is realized by an intersubjective verbal exchange between the two protagonists, the poor child and the old man rather than mere physical actions, building up child reader鈥檚 expectations of outcomes and providing maximum opportunities for the teaching of simple questions and answers as well as direct speech. Through the repetition of 鈥樷€榓(ch菐n)ttempt and consequence鈥欌€�, the poor boy鈥檚 honesty is tested: 鈥樷€楴ever to take anything that does not belong to you鈥欌€�. This moral lesson is further confirmed by the resolution at the end of the story 鈥樷€楪randpa nodded his head with a smile鈥欌€�.

Across this text and many others in the text corpus the discourse appears and reappears through different themes or aspects to emphasize the meaning of honest behaviour. These texts build up a version of the world where honest behaviour is conducted by adults; children are likely to go astray and, therefore, need to be supervised by adults. At the same time, they use textual and rhetorical devices to position the child reader in solidarity with the adults and the ideal child who performs honest acts and, hence, child readers might learn to behave in a like manner and take the same moral road.

    鈥�

 

II. Exposition writing (50 marks):

The growing pressure of the migrant population has pushed some big cities to the limits. This has made many people support the view that rapid population growth in major cities is creating more serious and perhaps unsolvable problems. What do you think are the major problems that may result from this big city population growth in China? Write an essay in no less than 150 words.

Marks will be awarded on the basis of your organization, diction, grammar and appropriateness.

 

III. Argumentation writing (60 marks):

There are two different opinions about the issue in English major education. Some people hold that traditional courses such as English literature, linguistics and translation should be required for English majors, arguing that development of humanistic qualities in them is the objective, while others advocate that in order to meet the need of society, producing versatile talents should be the objective of English education. In their opinion, some practical courses such as tourism English, business English, hotel English, etc. should be offered for English majors.

What is your opinion about the issue? Write a piece of argument in about 400 words. In the first part you should state your position clearly; in the second, you should supply relevant evidence to support your position and refute the opposing side鈥檚 view; and finally you should bring your essay to a logical conclusion.

Marks will be awarded on the basis of your organization, diction, grammar and appropriateness.

 

 

鍏嶈铂(z茅)鑱叉槑锛氭湰鏂囩郴杞�(zhu菐n)杓夎嚜缍�(w菐ng)绲�(lu貌)锛屽鏈変镜鐘�锛岃珛(q菒ng)鑱�(li谩n)绯绘垜鍊戠珛鍗冲埅闄�锛屽彟锛氭湰鏂囧儏浠h〃浣滆€呭€�(g猫)浜鸿榛�(di菐n)锛岃垏鏈恫(w菐ng)绔欑劇(w煤)闂�(gu膩n)銆傚叾鍘熷壍(chu脿ng)鎬т互鍙婃枃涓櫝杩版枃瀛楀拰鍏�(n猫i)瀹规湭缍�(j墨ng)鏈珯璀夊(sh铆)锛屽皪(du矛)鏈枃浠ュ強鍏朵腑鍏ㄩ儴鎴栬€呴儴鍒嗗収(n猫i)瀹�銆佹枃瀛楃殑鐪熷(sh铆)鎬�銆佸畬鏁存€�銆佸強鏅�(sh铆)鎬ф湰绔欎笉浣滀换浣曚繚璀夋垨鎵胯锛岃珛(q菒ng)璁€鑰呭儏浣滃弮鑰�锛屽苟璜�(q菒ng)鑷鏍稿(sh铆)鐩搁棞(gu膩n)鍏�(n猫i)瀹�銆�

  • 涓婁竴绡囨枃绔狅細

  • 涓嬩竴绡囨枃绔狅細
  • 鑰冨崥鍜ㄨQQ 3455265070 榛�(di菐n)鎿婇€欓噷绲︽垜鐧�(f膩)娑堟伅 鑰冪爺鍜ㄨ QQ 3455265070 榛�(di菐n)鎿婇€欓噷绲︽垜鐧�(f膩)娑堟伅 閮电锛� 3455265070@qq.com
    鍏徃鍚嶇ū:鏄嗗北鍓�(chu脿ng)閰蜂俊鎭鎶€鏈夐檺鍏徃 鐗堟瑠(qu谩n)鎵€鏈�
    鑰冪爺绉樼睄缍�(w菐ng) 鐗堟瑠(qu谩n)鎵€鏈� © kaoyanmiji.com All Rights Reserved
    鑱叉槑锛氭湰缍�(w菐ng)绔欏皧閲嶅苟淇濊(h霉)鐭ヨ瓨(sh铆)鐢�(ch菐n)娆�(qu谩n)锛屾牴鎿�(j霉)銆婁俊鎭恫(w菐ng)绲�(lu貌)鍌虫挱娆�(qu谩n)淇濊(h霉)姊濅緥銆嬶紝濡傛灉鎴戝€戣綁(zhu菐n)杓夋垨寮曠敤鐨勪綔鍝佷镜鐘簡鎮ㄧ殑娆�(qu谩n)鍒�锛岃珛(q菒ng)閫氱煡鎴戝€�锛屾垜鍊戞渻(hu矛)鍙婃檪(sh铆)鍒櫎锛�